Josh Schwartz Looks Back

We’ve had our ups and downs with Josh Schwartz. From calls of his head (I’m not kidding), to begging him to return (also not kidding), it’s been an up and down journey–perhaps just as up and down as Chuck’s own journey but today, 5 years later we get to say goodbye and maybe for once be thankful to the guy that brought us Chuck and gave us these roller coaster 5 years.

So read up on Josh looking back at the last 5 years and saying goodbye to the show that gave him just as much as it gave us. (With thanks to ChuckandSarahMedia for the original scan).

Entertainment Weekly:

Josh Schwartz: THEY SAY EVERY END IS A NEW BEGINNING. In the spring of 2007, I was on set for the last day of shooting The O.C. when I got the call. I need to immediately watch an audition for the lead of my new pilot Chuck. The actor who had just read? Zachary Levi.

And so began the most quixotic, satisfying, and, at times, surreal journey of my career. In the fall of 2007, I was lucky enough to have not only Chuck premiere but also another series I had co-created, Gossip Girl. What were the chances given that there are seven days in a week, that both shows would air against each other? They did, and my parents upgraded to a dual DVR.

As momentum for Chuck’s first season started to build, the writer’s strike hit. We didn’t know if we’d be back. We anxiously waited almost a year to return. As season 2 came to an end, we learned that NBC was going to air The Jay Leno Show five nights a week in prime time, eliminating five hours of time slots. Once again our future was in jeopardy. We may not have been a breakout hit, but we had a passionate fan base, and when NBC released its preliminary fall schedule in 2009 and Chuck wasn’t on it, those fans mobilized.

This wasn’t just a letter writing campaign but something that involved a new weapon in a fan’s crusade to save a show: mayonnaise. We had done some not so subtle product integrations promoting Subway sandwiches (which are delicious!). So our fans hit Subway shops around the world, ordering tens of thousands of foot-long turkeys. This garnered attention on a national level. NBC took note. With a mixture of pride and awe I can tell you: Chuck was saved by sandwiches. And by the the greatest, most passionate fans in the universe.

What kept Chuck from being a runaway hit was the same thing that made those who loved it so committed: a mash-up of genres–from spy to sci-fi to romantic comedy–with a heart devoted to its characters and a soul steeped in 1980s summer-movie geek culture. Well, ’80s everything.

Co-creator Chris Fedak and I used to marvel if the 13-year-old versions of us could see the show we were making, we’d lose our minds. It was our adolescent love of Quantum Leap that led us to pursue Scott Bakula for the role of Chuck’s dad. Knowing our precarious ratings situation, Scott advised: “Keep your head down, keep making the show. Next thing you know, it’s five years later. That’s how we did it on Quantum Leap.”

Casting actors we grew up loving didn’t end there. We were unabashed in our geekdom. Doc Brown’s Christopher Lloyd playing a member of the medical profession so Chuck could call the Back to the Future star “Doc”? Check. A huge influence on Chuck was Fletch, so it was an honor to have Chevy Chase play one of our best bad guys.  Of course, there would be no Chuck without James Bond. The first Bond movie I was old enough to see in theaters? The Living Daylights. So imagine the pulse-pounding excitement we felt when Timothy Dalton signed on for a season. And who else could have played Chuck’s mom than the female icon of summer movies of yore, The Terminator’s Linda Hamilton? The list goes on, and we knew our fans would be as excited about all this as we were.

Now thanks to NBC Entertainment chairman Bob Greenblatt, we get to say a proper farewell to those fans with our Jan. 27 series finale. And with every end comes a new beginning. On the last day of shooting Chuck, my daughter was born. That gives you perspective. My hope is one day some kid who grew up watching our show will have a show of their own, and that kid will hire one of our talented actors to appear. Then that actor can advice that kid, “Keep your head down, keep making the show. Next thing you know, it’s five years later. That’s how we did on Chuck.”

Nice of him to be cordial to Bob Greenblatt even after the most recent press…but then again we can’t assume that this letter wasn’t written before that. But still, a nice classy and deserved-to a point-thanks. In the end I think it’s a nice message, a nice look back at the 5 years that was…and the lots to be thankful for.


About Faith

Eternally faith-ful at least as it relates to my beloved Los Angeles Lakers. Yes that's where the username comes from. Other than that self-professed Chuckaholic, Laker blogger and part time internet addict. Ok, full time.
This entry was posted in Season 4. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Josh Schwartz Looks Back

  1. atcDave says:

    That was some very nice thoughts from Josh Schwartz. I know I haven’t always had kind words for him, but I will always appreciate his effort and vision that lead to Chuck!

    • esardi says:

      That was a real nice article from Schwartz. Thank you Faith for sharing. Well I know there is a lot of hand wringing going on with the fans. I know that we all hope for the best, However, I guess what has many of us including myself so worried is the fact this is the end of the series. If they had another nine episodes then they could do anything they wanted. The problem here is that if they screw this up then I believe the show that I love will be forever marked in a negative light.

      Remember that 3.13 there was a possibility that it would have been a series finale. That episode had so many things happening that when they got together it really was not satisfying. It was a good ending but not very satisfying. Their next episode was when I considered their relationship satisfying. That is my main concern that we will get a 3.13 all rushed with a good ending that leaves you with an empty feeling.

      • atcDave says:

        The good news this time though is we had some very satisfying episodes earlier in the season, Baby was an all time favorite for me. Part of why 3.13 failed was it was inadequate pay off for a season of misery. This time, we can be sure the misery will be more contained. As long as 5.13 ends well it will be a maximum of a three episode down beat. And I’m thinking Bullet Train will be fine until the end. Even better, 5.12 and 5.13 run the same night (I expect 5.12 to have one of the roughest endings of the series).

        The only real concern I have is that if they botch this ending there is no more episodes to fix it. But I’m betting they get it right in the end. I think a week from Friday night we’ll all be pretty happy (or relieved!).

  2. MyNameIsJeffNImLost says:

    Thanks, Faith. It was a very classy article from Schwartz.

  3. OldDarth says:

    It is intriguing how noticeably absent Schwartz has been; from his non-appearance at the last Chuck panel at SDCC onwards to doing very few, if any, press and interviews for the 5th Season until now.

    • BDaddyDL says:

      He has been busy on Heart of Dixie and some other projects. He said around comic con he would not be around much.

    • Ernie Davis says:

      Schwartz’s original contract only ran for 3 seasons. My guess is that it was structured that way because Fedak was unknown and untested as a show running EP. After three years of Fedak gaining experience Schwartz (like McG) stepped back from day to day involvement. I’ve never heard what sort of arrangement they reached, other than he still gets an EP credit, but I have heard that Zac essentially functions as a second EP to Fedak.

  4. Jason says:

    Schwartz wrote: ‘What kept Chuck from being a runaway hit was the same thing that made those who loved it so committed: a mash-up of genres–from spy to sci-fi to romantic comedy–with a heart devoted to its characters and a soul steeped in 1980s summer-movie geek culture. Well, ’80s everything.’

    I have posted the same thing several times how maddening the multiple genre thing is, often one or more of you have responded same as Schwartz, that you loved the mash-up of genres. I still maintain that Chuck would have been a runaway hit as a romantic comedy, the thing I would not argue however, is Chuck also might have been a smash hit as a spy action drama. Interesting that given a thousand or so words to sum up his experience on Chuck, Schwartz chose to touch on that small topic. I will enjoy reading those types of things about the show once things settle down, rather than speculate about mindset and motivation, we might get the real story, or at least what those who lived with the story are willing to share.

    Thanks Schwartz for both the interview and the show.

Comments are closed.